GOP Wants Hillary Audited

Posted by Wetenkamp on with 0 Comment

What’s the worst threat you can think of? The answer to this question probably depends on who you ask. My teenage daughter might say taking away her phone or the threat of somebody unfollowing her on Instagram. If you ask any normal adult person, it might be the threat of physical harm. But if you ask somebody in my circle of friends, it would definitely be the threat of an IRS audit.  There are few things more agonizing than the dreaded audit.

The Republican Party is threatening Hillary Clinton and her family’s charity, the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), not with legal action, but with an IRS audit. Of course, they can’t audit her themselves; they filed a formal complaint asking the IRS to audit the charity. CHAI staved off an investigation back in May by agreeing to file amended returns and fix the problem. But now they are taking the position that the income was correctly stated and amendments are not necessary. As the Democratic front runner, Hillary will undoubtedly attract plenty of scrutiny, and the Republicans will do their best to portray her as a tax cheat.

Clinton Foundation Under Fire for Tax Errors

Posted by Wetenkamp on with 0 Comment

Filing an amended tax return is normally not that big of a deal.  It is not uncommon for folks to make mistakes or leave out information on their Form 1040 personal income tax filing.  To amend a previously filed Form 1040, you need to complete a “1040x.”  If you want to make corrections on multiple tax years, you need a separate 1040x for each year and you need to mail them in separate envelopes to ensure they are processed correctly.  The basic structure of a 1040x is pretty straightforward: Column A shows the figures as reported on your original 1040, Column B shows the corrected figures, and Column C shows the difference between the two.  Furthermore, barring other relevant facts, the filing of a 1040x does not automatically put you into a high audit risk group.

The problem with Hillary Clinton and her foundation is there are a few “other relevant factors” that have placed their actions in the spotlight (catch up on the story here).  For one, we’re talking about million dollar mistakes, meaning they put “zero,” when the correct number was something in the tens of millions of dollars range.  Kind of hard to swallow, right?  And similar “mistakes” were made three years in a row.  In the words of charity law experts:

It [is] not remarkable for a charity to refile an erroneous return once in a while, but for a large, global charity to refile three or four years in a row [is] highly unusual.

Now House republicans are calling for an IRS investigation.  Most letters to Commissioner John Koskinen would probably be ignored or referred out to a different IRS department in typical IRS style, but I’m guessing this one will get adequate attention.

IRS Stays Away from Churches

Posted by Wetenkamp on with 0 Comment

Do you know the difference between a non-profit religious organization and a church?  Perhaps the biggest difference is their tax obligations.  While it is true that neither  is required to pay taxes, a pastor, televangelist, or broadcasting company that is registered as a religious organization must file information returns (Form 990) with the IRS that disclose how their money is spent.  However, churches, for the most part, do not have to answer to anyone.

John Burnett, reporting for National Public Radio, writes about a Christian television network called “Daystar” that operates much like a wealthy corporation, except without the transparency.  Yet they call themselves a church and the IRS has never questioned it so far as anyone knows.  There is a 14-point test that the IRS may use (in theory) to determine if an entity qualifies as a church under the law, but the IRS doesn’t enforce it. And if these churchy executives decide they want to drive Bentleys and live in sprawling chateus, they do it.  If they want to spend donation money on their own pet causes, then they do it.  According to IRS insiders, the government just doesn’t audit churches anymore, for at least the past five years anyway.

As part of America’s commitment to religious freedom, anyone can start a church, start preaching and passing the collection plate. They are presumed to be a church by the IRS — no questions asked.

Quoting former Daystar employees and tax attorneys, Burnett makes it pretty clear that Daystar would never meet the criteria for church status if the IRS were to enforce its own rules.  We all know how good the IRS is about enforcing its own rules…

IRS Records Prove AROD is a Bad Guy in Boston

Posted by Montgomery on with 0 Comment

According to a recent Boston Globe review of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) filings New York Yankee Alex Rodriguez is a bad guy. A Boston news source depicting a Yankee as a bad guy is hardly surprising. What interests me, as a tax attorney, is that the basis for hatred for Rodriguez this time is not baseball related; it is based on IRS records. According to the Boston Globe, nonprofit organizations are generally expected to donate 65 to 75 percent of their revenues to their designated charitable causes. The remainder of their revenues are supposed to be used to pay their necessary expenses and reasonable salaries of nonprofit employees. This was not the case for Rodriguez’s non-profit organization, according to the Globe.

In 2006, Rodriguez hosted a charity poker tournament that helped the A-Rod Family Foundation raise $403,862 for charity. How nice! However, according to IRS reports, barely 1 percent of the money raised were actually paid to charity. Specifically, only $5,000 was paid to Jay-Z’s Shawn Carter Scholarship Fund and only $90 was paid to a Little League baseball team in Miami; how charitable. The not for profit organization subsequently stopped submitting financial reports to the IRS, and was then stripped of its tax-exempt status. Again, AROD is a bad guy … no shocker … just surprised the revelation was tax based.

The “Common Cause” Whistleblower Case

Posted by Montgomery on with 0 Comment

You may have heard about the complaint filed by Common Cause against American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) asking the IRS to drop the organization’s tax-exempt status for engaging in lobbying activities.  What you may not know is this complaint was filed under the 145-year-old whistleblower provisions now codified in 26 USC 7623.

Has ALEC been exploiting the tax relief available to non-profits?

Common Cause is characterizing ALEC ‘s activities as an improper tax scheme and is asking the IRS to investigate and assess all taxes due.  If taxes are in fact collected from ALEC, it would seem that Dr. Robert W. Edgar, the president and CEO of Common Cause, stands to gain a large sum of money.  One of the requirements under the whistleblower statute is that the complaint be filed by an individual, and it appears to have been filed on behalf of Dr. Edgar.  Under the 2006 amendments to the whistleblower statute, the maximum award is 15% of the taxes and penalties collected (capped at $10 million).

So far ALEC has responded to the allegations by calling them a “harassment tactic.”

“[I]t’s clear to me that this is a tired campaign to abuse the legal system, distort the facts and tarnish the reputation of ideological foes….Without question, Common Cause is a partisan front group masquerading as an ethics watchdog.

~ Alan P. Dye, attorney for ALEC