We know there is at least some rhyme or reason to who gets selected for an IRS audit. If we knew all the criteria, we could position ourselves to avoid audits 100% of the time, but, for obvious reasons, the IRS hasn’t been so generous when it comes to publishing their audit selection criteria or algorithms. One thing that we can be sure of is the IRS flags tax returns that possess certain risk factors because, if they’re going to spend resources auditing a certain number of returns each year, it might as well be those that are more likely to contain errors or “problems.”
So far, so good. That much makes sense. The IRS flags cases that it considers to be good audit material. But, based on a news story that broke today, maybe the IRS should also be flagging cases that should not be audited.
Of all the “do not audit” entities out there, shouldn’t Logan Clements, the producer of “Sick and Sicker: ObamaCare Canadian Style,” be near the top of the list? I haven’t seen this film, but I’m gonna guess that Clements is not a big fan of Obama, and not a big fan of the Affordable Care Act. And I have absolutely no idea about the integrity of his taxes, but it just doesn’t look right for the IRS to audit somebody like this. Meanwhile, Clements is using the media attention from the audit to catapult his film into the spotlight quite nicely. I understand the IRS faces a catch 22 here: if they audit this guy, it looks very fishy, but if they let him go, it sets a weird precedent and makes a whole segment of society (notable conservatives) exempt from audits. In fact, I think a strong case can be made that public perception should not even enter the equation. But the IRS better hope they find something seriously wrong with this guys taxes. Or if it turns out to be a “no changes” kind of audit, they had better close it quickly and hope this story fades away quietly.