Time is Running Out on the Payroll Tax Extension

Posted by Wetenkamp on with 0 Comment

Further payroll tax relief may have to wait.  Most Americans who have been following the story probably thought a two-month extension of the payroll tax cut was the best that could be arranged for now and it was a done deal.  In fact, after the Senate approved the measure on Saturday, they left Washington for their holiday break.  But not so fast — it still had to get past the House in today’s vote . . . and it didn’t.

Today the House voted 229-193 in opposition to the two-month extension.  This has the effect of kicking the measure back to the Senate, but Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid, refuses to continue negotiations on a long-term deal until the House approves the preliminary one.  Here is the way he spins it:

I have been trying to negotiate a yearlong extension with Republicans for weeks, and I am happy to continue doing so as soon as the House of Representatives passes the bipartisan compromise to protect middle-class families, but not before then.

~ Senate Majority leader Harry Reid, D-Nev

If something isn’t done before the end of the year, then the payroll taxes will go up by 2 percentage points in January and nearly 2 million people could lose unemployment benefits.

www.mwattorneys.com

Another Co-conspirator in the Madoff Scheme

Posted by Wetenkamp on with 0 Comment

Today Enrica Cotellessa-Pitz, Bernie Madoff’s former controller, pleaded guilty to conspiracy, falsifying books and records, and making false filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. She could spend up to 50 years in prison.

Cotellessa-Pitz said she started working at Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC in 1978 while she was studying economics in college. She was named controller in late 1998. She said Madoff and others within months were directing her to put false entries in the company’s books to make it appear profitable trades were being made and that losses were not incurred.

~ LARRY NEUMEISTER, The Associated Press

She also helped Madoff’s organization reduce its tax liabilities by underreporting income to the IRS. Madoff’s own 2004 tax return was audited when he underreported by millions of dollars. And then when faced with audits, Cotellessa-Pitz perpetuated the fraud by providing false information to the SEC and the IRS.

www.mwattorneys.com

Long-term Payroll Tax Cut Decisions Postponed

Posted by Wetenkamp on with 0 Comment

The Senate approved a mere two-month extension of the payroll tax cut today, which still has to get through the House.

Senate approved a $33 billion package to extend unemployment benefits, extend a payroll tax holiday for millions of American workers and avoid cuts in payments to doctors who accept Medicare.  The measure is effective through February, when Congress will once again be locked in battle over whether and how to further extend those provisions.

~ Jennifer Steinhauer, New York Times

The agreement includes the Keystone XL legislation that Obama previously said he would veto. Today’s news is infuriating for many because it seems like despite all the battling and negotiating in Congress, nothing meaningful was accomplished.

www.mwattorneys.com

IRS Tips: Charitable Contributions

Posted by Wetenkamp on with 0 Comment

Assuming anybody has any money to give this year, the IRS offers the following advice on claiming deductions for charitable giving:

  • If you want the deduction count on your 2011 taxes, then you have to make the contribution before the end of the year.
  • The organization you donate to must be a qualified organization — confirm using IRS Publication 78.
  • Charitable contributions are only deductible if you itemize, not if you take the standard deduction.
  • Keep good records and save donation receipts.
  • You may need to complete Form 8283 for non-cash contributions

As always, the best, most comprehensive source of information is the IRS publication on the topic.  For more information related to charitable contributions, see Publication 526 (available on the IRS website).

www.mwattorneys.com

Does the IRS View Marion Barry as a “Special Circumstance”?

Posted by Wetenkamp on with 0 Comment

Former D.C. mayor, Marion Barry, is in the news today because of a lien that the IRS filed against him in connection with a measly $3,200 in unpaid 2010 taxes.

Remember back in February of this year when the IRS announced it was going to provide taxpayers with special tax relief during these trying financial times? The IRS dubbed it the “Fresh Start” initiative. Remember when I blogged in June about the uncertainties of the program and how the IRS still had not clarified some major points? Remember what I said about the new lien filing procedures; how the lien filing threshold was reduced from $10,000 to $5,000 in most cases? According to the IRS website:

The Fresh Start changes increase the IRS lien filing threshold from $5,000 to $10,000. Liens may still be filed on amounts less than $10,000 when circumstances warrant. (emphasis added)

 

So, why did the IRS file a lien if the balance is under $5,000? Well, it appears that Barry’s 2010 liability is only the tip of the iceberg. He still owes for prior years, for which he is on an installment agreement in good standing, according to Barry’s official statement. It appears that the IRS will be looking at the overall balance in determining whether to file a lien, even under Fresh Start. At least that’s one possible explanation. The other possibility is that the IRS would have filed a lien on Barry even if $3,200 were all he owed . . . because circumstances warrant it. Let’s face it, he’s a public figure sitting on a Finance Committee in D.C, in charge of public funds, and he has a colorful history of corruption and tax delinquencies. If that isn’t a special circumstance, then I don’t know what is.

www.mwattorneys.com

Christmas Carolers Banished from Post Office

Posted by Wetenkamp on with 0 Comment

Just in case you were considering the local post office as one of the stops on your caroling route this year, think again.  It would be a violation of USPS rules.

A group of carolers dressed as characters from the classic tale A Christmas Carol popped into a post office in Silver Springs (Montgomery county) Maryland recently and were told to leave by a manager. And there was no indication they were singing off-key. It’s just that the USPS does not permit public assembly inside any of its branches. In the words of USPS spokesperson, Laura Dvorak:

[T]he carolers . . . were in violation of the Postal Service’s rules on public assembly and public address. Inside the post office, however, the expectation is that public assembly will be either conducted or sponsored by the Postal Service.

This has caused quite a bit of stir on the Internet in the past few days. Some groups say this is all part of a larger scheme to de-emphasize Christmas and eliminate “anything remotely connected to anything religious” during the holidays (a.k.a., the “war on Christmas”) despite all the Christmasy — even religious-themed — stamps available this time of year.

www.mwattorneys.com

IRS Loves TMZ

Posted by Wetenkamp on with 0 Comment

If you’ve ever stumbled upon the TMZ website, you know how they love to expose celebrity tax problems.  If I didn’t know better, I’d say they have some secret relationship with the IRS.  I mean, what a huge benefit to the IRS to have these cases all over the internet where people can see them.

A quick perusal of the TMZ website reveals the tax issues (past and present) of the following celebs:

  1. Christie Brinkley
  2. Bow Wow
  3. Chris Tucker
  4. Sandra Oh
  5. Al Pacino
  6. The Osbournes
  7. Nicolaus Cage
  8. Val Kilmer
  9. Toni Braxton

The list goes on and on.  My apologies if this blog is starting to look TMZ-ish, but celebrities just can’t stay out of tax trouble.  As their fame (and income) start to slide, they find themselves overextended and tax bills often go unpaid. Besides, I do think it is constructive to call out the celebs, especially if it gets us to ponder our own spending habits and live more frugally.

www.mwattorneys.com

Chris Tucker Sheds Assets to Pay Back IRS

Posted by Wetenkamp on with 0 Comment

Chris Tucker, the actor best known for his work in the Rush Hour series of films, has been selling his properties in Florida to pay back what he owes to the IRS.

Mr. Tucker owes $11.5 million in back taxes (perhaps somewhat less now that he has sold off some assets). Reports indicate that he sold his Florida properties for much less than fair market value, which indicates to me that he was in a big hurry to raise some cash under pressure from the IRS.

We don’t have the complete details, but with a $11.5 million tax bill, certainly the IRS has already threatened to seize his property. Why else would he take less than it’s worth? The dilemma for Mr. Tucker is if he had not sold the property, the IRS would have seize it and auctioned it off to the top bidder. A taxpayer can normally get a much better price in a private sale than what can be fetched in a public IRS auction. But the IRS doesn’t allow the taxpayer to put a property on the market and wait until he gets his asking price. Pressure from the IRS usually forces the seller to accept less — in this case, less than fair market value.

www.mwattorneys.com

Rihanna too Mainstream for NPR

Posted by Wetenkamp on with 0 Comment

Bob Boilen and his co-hosts shared their favorite songs of 2011 recently on NPR’s “All Songs Considered.”

I often appreciate the music on this program and I sometimes even like the commentary, although much of the time it lacks the “analysis” that a lawyer would expect. A professional music critic should find better ways of describing a song than by saying, “it just takes me to this certain place . . . “

What bothered me most about the 2011 “favorites” episode is one of the guest commentators, Stephen Thompson, really wanted to pick Rihanna’s “We Found Love” but selected a different song under duress. Apparently Bob Boilen told him to pick something different. IMHO the credibility of this program, or its hosts, or its producers, would have been enhanced if they had just gone with this pick. Yes, Rihanna is more mainstream and most of her fans are probably under 18, but that shouldn’t matter, right?  A good song is a good song.  I just feel like the All Songs Considered crew are a little more concerned about picking the obscure, hipster musicians’ work than with picking really good songs.

Maybe I was also annoyed because I just really like “We Found Love.” I can’t believe I’m defending Rihanna. That’s a little embarrassing.  Ok, I think I understand now.

DOJ Shuts Down “Redemption Theory” Tax Fraud Ring

Posted by Wetenkamp on with 0 Comment

This week the US Department of Justice released the names of seven individuals who have been charged in a $120 million tax fraud scheme. According to the indictment, the false return scheme was national in scope, causing the filing of tax returns for at least 180 clients from 30 different states, and requesting more than $120 million worth of fraudulent tax refunds. The indictment alleges that the defendants and clients of the scheme collectively filed more than 380 tax returns, mostly from tax year 2008, reporting the amount of their personal debt obligations as both income and as federal tax withholding.

Other reports mention the scammers were promulgating a “redemption theory.” Here’s the scoop on this bizarre tax protestor theory according to Wikipedia:

Redemption theory involves claims that when the U.S. government abandoned the gold standard in 1933, the government pledged its citizens as collateral so that the government could borrow money. The movement also asserts that common citizens can gain access to funds in secret accounts using obscure procedures and regulations.

According to the theory, the government created a fictitious person (or “straw man”) corresponding to each newborn citizen with bank accounts initially holding $630,000. The theory further holds that through obscure procedures under the Uniform Commercial Code, a citizen can “reclaim” the straw man and write checks against its accounts.

The “straw man” argument is cited by the IRS as one of the 40 frivolous tax arguments which, if made, subjects the taxpayer to tougher penalties. The “straw man” argument is #18.

www.mwattorneys.com